Amazon to Close 7 Quebec Warehouses, Cutting 1,700 Jobs: What It Means for Workers and Shoppers
In a surprising turn of events, Amazon has announced the closure of all seven of its warehouses in Quebec over the next two months, eliminating approximately 1,700 permanent full-time jobs and 250 temporary positions. The e-commerce giant stated that this decision is part of a broader strategy to deliver “even more savings to our customers over the long run.” However, the move has sparked outrage from workers, unions, and Canadian officials alike.
Amazon’s closures include one fulfillment center, two sorting centers, three delivery stations, and an AMXL facility designed to handle large goods such as TVs and furniture. Instead of operating its warehouses, Amazon plans to revert to its pre-2020 model by partnering with local third-party delivery companies to handle logistics.
Impacted Workers and Union Tensions
The news hits hard for the 1,700+ employees in Quebec’s greater Montreal area who will lose their jobs. While Amazon has offered affected employees a package that includes up to 14 weeks’ pay, transitional benefits, and job placement resources, the move has drawn criticism for its timing and implications.
Read: A Simple Document Most Visa Applicants Forget—And It Changes Everything
The Canadian Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, François-Philippe Champagne, expressed frustration with the abrupt closures, stating, “This is not the way business is done in Canada.”
The closure has also ignited tensions with labor unions. Notably, just months ago, workers at Amazon’s Laval warehouse successfully unionized—becoming the first in Canada to do so. Many see the closures as a direct retaliation against unionization efforts, a claim echoed by union leader Caroline Senneville, who described the closures as “a slap in the face for all Quebec workers.”
Michael Lynk, a professor emeritus of law, compared the situation to Walmart’s controversial closure of a unionized store in Quebec two decades ago, which was eventually deemed a violation of labor law by the Supreme Court of Canada.
What Does This Mean for Amazon Customers in Quebec?
For Amazon shoppers in Quebec, this decision could lead to changes in delivery times and service quality. By outsourcing logistics to local companies, Amazon may save costs, but it’s unclear if the savings will trickle down to customers or lead to delays during the transition period.
Read – How to Secure a High-Paying Job in Canada Without a Degree—Success Stories Revealed
A Broader Question About Workers’ Rights and Corporate Practices
This move by Amazon brings to light critical issues about workers’ rights and the ethics of large corporations in handling labor relations. For years, Amazon has been under scrutiny for its treatment of employees and resistance to unionization. This latest move adds fuel to the fire, raising questions about whether such closures are a means to circumvent unionization efforts.
For those in Quebec and beyond, this news sends a message about the challenges of balancing economic efficiency with fair labor practices. It’s a moment for customers and policymakers to reflect: Are we holding corporations accountable for their actions, especially when they impact thousands of lives?
What This Means for You
Whether you’re an Amazon customer in Quebec, a worker in the logistics industry, or a supporter of fair labor practices, this decision could set a precedent for how corporations respond to unionization efforts in Canada. While Amazon’s promise of savings may sound appealing to shoppers, the human cost of such decisions cannot be overlooked.
Read – The Fastest-Growing Industries in Canada for 2025—Where the Jobs Will Be
How do you feel about this? Should corporations prioritize profit over people? Or is this a necessary step for businesses to stay competitive? Let’s talk about it in the comments.
Hello sir how are you
My Name Muhammad Faisal
My age 25
I am a Pakistan But
I live in Dubai
And I am a truck driver
I work in Qatar as a welder and SS transport waiter, foot packing.